Enjin: NFT Crypto Walletlatest release: 1.15.0 ( 21st June 2021 ) last analysed 4th September 2021 Not functioning anymore
Older reviews (show 0 of 1 reproducible)
Help spread awareness for build reproducibility
Please help us spread the word discussing build reproducibility with Enjin: NFT Crypto Wallet via their Twitter!
Do your own research!
Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.
The Analysis ¶
Update 2021-08-26: This app is no more.
Enjin: Blockchain & Crypto Wallet description starts promising:
“Your private keys are your own”
They advertise advanced securing techniques among which are:
An extensive independent security audit and penetration test found no security issues.
(You can read the report here)
But source code isn’t available on their website. So the user is left with only one choice: trust.
Our verdict: not verifiable.
in-app browsing: “ENJOY SEAMLESS BROWSING Interact with any DApp with the single click of a button—without leaving the safety of your crypto wallet.”
looks very advanced, the list of features is tremendous. also an old player:
Founded in 2009 and based in Singapore, Enjin offers an ecosystem of integrated, user-first blockchain products that enable anyone to easily manage, explore, distribute, and integrate blockchain-based assets.
on their main page, they advertise advanced securing techniques amongst which are:
- Custom ARM instructions ensure that sensitive data is instantly deleted from your phone’s memory.
- Enjin Keyboard. Built from scratch to protect you from any form of data sniffing or keyloggers.
This product went out of business ... or so. Read the analysis for details.
As part of our Methodology, we ask:Is the product still supported by the still existing provider? If not, we tag it Defunct!
Discontinued products or worse, products of providers that are not active anymore, are problematic, especially if they were not formerly reproducible and well audited to be self-custodial following open standards. If the provider hasn’t answered inquiries for a year but their server is still running or similar circumstances might get this verdict, too.
Share onTwitter Facebook LinkedIn
Or embed a widget in your website
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=iphone/com.enjin.mobile.wallet&theme=auto&style=short" name="_ts" style="min-width:180px;border:0;border-radius:10px;max-width:280px;min-height:30px;"> </iframe>
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=iphone/com.enjin.mobile.wallet&theme=auto&style=long" style="max-width:100%;width:342px;border:0;border-radius:10px;min-height:290px;"> </iframe>