Wallet Logo

Archos Safe-T Touch

Latest release: 1.2.5 ( 18th December 2019 ) 🔍 Last analysed 22nd August 2021 . No source for current release found
31st March 2019

Without public source of the reviewed release available, this product cannot be verified!

As part of our Methodology, we ask:

Is the source code publicly available?

If the answer is "no", we mark it as "No source for current release found".

A wallet that claims to not give the provider the means to steal the users’ funds might actually be lying. In the spirit of “Don’t trust - verify!” you don’t want to take the provider at his word, but trust that people hunting for fame and bug bounties could actually find flaws and back-doors in the wallet so the provider doesn’t dare to put these in.

Back-doors and flaws are frequently found in closed source products but some remain hidden for years. And even in open source security software there might be catastrophic flaws undiscovered for years.

An evil wallet provider would certainly prefer not to publish the code, as hiding it makes audits orders of magnitude harder.

For your security, you thus want the code to be available for review.

If the wallet provider doesn’t share up to date code, our analysis stops there as the wallet could steal your funds at any time, and there is no protection except the provider’s word.

“Up to date” strictly means that any instance of the product being updated without the source code being updated counts as closed source. This puts the burden on the provider to always first release the source code before releasing the product’s update. This paragraph is a clarification to our rules following a little poll.

We are not concerned about the license as long as it allows us to perform our analysis. For a security audit, it is not necessary that the provider allows others to use their code for a competing wallet. You should still prefer actual open source licenses as a competing wallet won’t use the code without giving it careful scrutiny.

The product cannot be independently verified. If the provider puts your funds at risk on purpose or by accident, you will probably not know about the issue before people start losing money. If the provider is more criminally inclined he might have collected all the backups of all the wallets, ready to be emptied at the press of a button. The product might have a formidable track record but out of distress or change in management turns out to be evil from some point on, with nobody outside ever knowing before it is too late.

Help spread awareness for build reproducibility

Please help us spread the word discussing transparency with Archos Safe-T Touch  via their Twitter!

Do your own research!

Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.

If you find something we should include, you can create an issue or edit this analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes.

The Analysis 

After not so much success reviewing its predecessor Archos Safe-T mini No Source! , we have little hope to get to a better verdict here.

In fact … here is their companion app, with +5k downloads and a single, negative and rather verifiable review:

★☆☆☆☆ 20 March 2021
This unethical company is still selling this piece of * even though they know they don’t provide any software updates and what they currently have is so bad and outdated that make their hardware useless. No third party option either. Total scam.

This companion app was last updated 2019-12-18, almost two years ago as of now.

The firmware is available as download:

Download firmware v1.2.5 for your ARCHOS SafeT touch (Windows compatible only)

but without a date and as it’s “Windows only” and named “Upgrader”, it’s not actually the firmware you get there neither.

Between “stale”, “obsolete” or “closed source”, we go with the latter verdict and conclude this product is not verifiable.

(ml, lw)