Wallet Logo

Unstoppable Crypto Wallet

Latest release: 0.30.0 ( 7th February 2023 ) 🔍 Last analysed 1st November 2022 . Reproducible when tested
3.9 ★★★★★
556 ratings
10 thousand
18th December 2018

The binary provided was reproducible from the code provided.

As part of our Methodology, we ask:

Does the binary we built differ from what we downloaded?

If the answer is "no", we mark it as "Reproducible when tested".

If we can reproduce the binary we downloaded from the public source code, with all bytes accounted for, we call the product reproducible. This does not mean we audited the code but it’s the precondition to make sure the public code has relevance for the provided binary.

If the provider puts your funds at risk on purpose or by accident, security researchers can see this if they care to look. It also means that inside the company, engineers can verify that the release manager is releasing the product based on code known to all engineers on the team. A scammer would have to work under the potential eyes of security researchers. He would have to take more effort in hiding any exploit.

“Reproducible” does not mean “verified”. There is good reason to believe that security researchers as of today would not detect very blatant backdoors in the public source code before it gets exploited, much less if the attacker takes moderate efforts to hide it. This is especially true for less popular projects.

Show Older Reviews

Help spread awareness for build reproducibility

Please follow Unstoppable Crypto Wallet and thank them for being reproducible  via their Twitter!


The following Analysis is not a full code review! We plan to make code reviews available in the future but even then it will never be a stamp of approval but rather a list of incidents and questionable coding practice. Nasa sends probes to space that crash due to software bugs despite a huge budget and stringent scrutiny.

Do your own research!

Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.

If you find something we should include, you can create an issue or edit this analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes.

The Analysis 

Here we test if the latest version can be reproduced, following the known procedure expressed in our test script (?):

===== Begin Results =====
appId:          io.horizontalsystems.bankwallet
signer:         c1899493e440489178b8748851b72cbed50c282aaa8c03ae236a4652f8c4f27b
apkVersionName: 0.27.0
apkVersionCode: 68
verdict:        reproducible
appHash:        d8fea2bae72514eddb4c32ccb21b3ba3c699ce95ee4d7fbb20b8da0b8b473c41
commit:         645d587fb3c3825da0ebfb9be13ff9fd31837a09

Only in /tmp/fromPlay_io.horizontalsystems.bankwallet_68/META-INF: MANIFEST.MF
Only in /tmp/fromPlay_io.horizontalsystems.bankwallet_68/META-INF: RELEASEK.RSA
Only in /tmp/fromPlay_io.horizontalsystems.bankwallet_68/META-INF: RELEASEK.SF

Revision, tag (and its signature):

===== End Results =====

which is what we want to see to give this wallet the verdict: reproducible

Thank you to Horizontal Systems for repeat donations