Wallet Logo

MathWallet: Bitcoin,Ethereum,EOS,Polkadot,Cosmos

latest release: 4.1.8 ( 10th June 2021 ) last analysed  18th June 2021 Not functioning anymore 
4.0 ★★★★★
1060 ratings
50 thousand
17th April 2018

Jump to verdict 

Older reviews (show 0 of 1 reproducible)

Help spread awareness for build reproducibility

Please help us spread the word discussing build reproducibility with MathWallet: Bitcoin,Ethereum,EOS,Polkadot,Cosmos  via their Twitter!

Do your own research!

Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.

If you find something we should include, you can create an issue or edit this analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes.

The Analysis 

Update: This app is not available on Google Play anymore.

This wallet claims:

  • Secure your assets with Private Keys, Mnemonic Phrases, 2-Factor Authentication, and more

which kind of sort of sounds like a non-custodial wallet but also doesn’t make much sense. The private keys are what you want to protect. They are not a tool to protect something.

Their website as per the dedicated data field on Google Play appears to not link back to the wallet but in the description they mention a different website: mathwallet.org.

There we find no further claims about who holds the keys or public source code.

As they also promote a Math Cloud Wallet which is

Convenient, safe and easy to use custodial wallet

we assume the wallet here is meant to be non-custodial but as it’s closed source, it is not verifiable.

Verdict Explained

This product went out of business ... or so. Read the analysis for details.

As part of our Methodology, we ask:

Is the product still supported by the still existing provider? If not, we tag it Defunct! 

Discontinued products or worse, products of providers that are not active anymore, are problematic, especially if they were not formerly reproducible and well audited to be self-custodial following open standards. If the provider hasn’t answered inquiries for a year but their server is still running or similar circumstances might get this verdict, too.