DOPAMINE - Bitcoin, Crypto, NFT, In-game, DEFILatest release: Varies with device ( 17th May 2022 ) 🔍 Last analysed 10th October 2021 . No source for current release found
Help spread awareness for build reproducibility
Please help us spread the word discussing transparency with DOPAMINE - Bitcoin, Crypto, NFT, In-game, DEFI via their Twitter!
Do your own research!
Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.
The Analysis ¶
From its Google Play Description:
- Crypto YouTubers
- Exchange Markets
- Cryptocurrency Converter
- Crypto Education
- ICO Initial Coin Offering
- Recently Added
- Crypto News
- Favorite coins
- Global Data and Chart & Global Data Widget
- Percentage Change Period (1h, 24h, 7d)
The FAQ, also mentions that it is possible to send/receive cryptocurrencies using its self-custodial app.
We were not able to find the source code on the site. We queried their twitter account for feedback.
We downloaded the app and no registration was needed. All they asked for was a password. They then provided a 12-word seed.
After that, we found the ‘Add Wallet - Bitcoin’ option. Two options were then available: Create a wallet and Import a Wallet. It then possible to copy the WIF (Wallet Import Format). It is composed of 52 characters.
They service claims to offer a self-custodial app, but we were not able to find a verifiable and public source code.
Without public source of the reviewed release available, this product cannot be verified!
As part of our Methodology, we ask:Is the source code publicly available? If not, we tag it No Source!
A wallet that claims to not give the provider the means to steal the users’ funds might actually be lying. In the spirit of “Don’t trust - verify!” you don’t want to take the provider at his word, but trust that people hunting for fame and bug bounties could actually find flaws and back-doors in the wallet so the provider doesn’t dare to put these in.
Back-doors and flaws are frequently found in closed source products but some remain hidden for years. And even in open source security software there might be catastrophic flaws undiscovered for years.
An evil wallet provider would certainly prefer not to publish the code, as hiding it makes audits orders of magnitude harder.
For your security, you thus want the code to be available for review.
If the wallet provider doesn’t share up to date code, our analysis stops there as the wallet could steal your funds at any time, and there is no protection except the provider’s word.
“Up to date” strictly means that any instance of the product being updated without the source code being updated counts as closed source. This puts the burden on the provider to always first release the source code before releasing the product’s update. This paragraph is a clarification to our rules following a little poll.
We are not concerned about the license as long as it allows us to perform our analysis. For a security audit, it is not necessary that the provider allows others to use their code for a competing wallet. You should still prefer actual open source licenses as a competing wallet won’t use the code without giving it careful scrutiny.
Share onTwitter Facebook LinkedIn
Or embed a widget in your website
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=android/com.kyriakosalexandrou.coinmarketcap&theme=auto&style=short" name="_ts" style="min-width:180px;border:0;border-radius:10px;max-width:280px;min-height:30px;"> </iframe>
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=android/com.kyriakosalexandrou.coinmarketcap&theme=auto&style=long" style="max-width:100%;width:342px;border:0;border-radius:10px;min-height:290px;"> </iframe>