Wallet Logo

Blockchain Wallet

Latest release: 21 ( 30th August 2020 ) 🔍 Last analysed 17th February 2021 . Under development Not functioning anymore
4.6 ★★★★★
1374 ratings
50 thousand

Jump to verdict 

Do your own research!

Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.

If you find something we should include, you can create an issue or edit this analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes.

The Analysis 

Update: This app is not on Google Play anymore

This app is … a game … turned into a tool to collect your blockchain.com wallet credentials?

We decompiled the app and found no single mention of “bitcoin” or “wallet” but we found “Level0” to “Level6”, “globalgamemanagers”, some obfuscated classes in the “unity3d/player” folder and assume the form where it asks you for your credentials is being loaded from a remote server upon app start as none of the elements of the main screen can be found in the source code.

Some obfuscated code example:

public final class l {
    private static boolean a = false;
    private boolean b = (!h.c);
    private boolean c = false;
    private boolean d = false;
    private boolean e = true;

    l() {
    }

    static void a() {
        a = true;
    }

    static void b() {
        a = false;
    }

    static boolean c() {
        return a;
    }

    public final void a(boolean z) {
        this.c = z;
    }

    public final void b(boolean z) {
        this.e = z;
    }

That’s typical minification. Lengthy, self-explanatory names get converted into short symbols.

In summary: Do not share your blockchain.com credentials with this app! You will lose your funds! This app is 100% for sure not related to blockchain.com.

Verdict Explained

We still have to analyze this product.

As part of our Methodology, we ask:

Did we get to a conclusion on the verdict of this product yet? If not, we tag it Development

This product still needs to be evaluated some more. We only gathered name, logo and maybe some more details but we have not yet come to a conclusion what to make of this product.

But we also ask:

Is the product still supported by the still existing provider? If not, we tag it Defunct!

Discontinued products or worse, products of providers that are not active anymore, are problematic, especially if they were not formerly reproducible and well audited to be self-custodial following open standards. If the provider hasn’t answered inquiries for a year but their server is still running or similar circumstances might get this verdict, too.