Wallet Logo


latest release: ?? last analysed  23rd July 2021 Under development

Jump to verdict 

Help spread awareness for build reproducibility

Please help us spread the word discussing build reproducibility with Lattice1  via their Twitter!

Do your own research!

Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.

If you find something we should include, you can create an issue or edit this analysis yourself and create a merge request for your changes.

The Analysis 

Lattice devices can work in conjunction with the providers safecards, safecards store private keys offline from the lattice device. Safecards themselves could be considered wallets, but they are unable to sign transactions without the lattice device.

The lattice device should be reviewed in conjuction with the safecard, the safecard by itself is of no use without the lattice device.


Verdict Explained

We still have to analyze this product.

As part of our Methodology, we ask:

Did we get to a conclusion on the transparency of this product yet? If not, we tag it Development

This product still needs to be evaluated some more. We only gathered name, logo and maybe some more details but we have not yet come to a conclusion what to make of this product.