MoneyPipe: HD Bitcoin Walletlatest release: 4.0 ( 25th November 2021 ) last analysed 17th November 2021 No source for current release found
Help spread awareness for build reproducibility
Please help us spread the word discussing transparency with MoneyPipe: HD Bitcoin Wallet via their Twitter!
Do your own research!
Try out searching for "lost bitcoins", "stole my money" or "scammers" together with the wallet's name, even if you think the wallet is generally trustworthy. For all the bigger wallets you will find accusations. Make sure you understand why they were made and if you are comfortable with the provider's reaction.
The Analysis ¶
MoneyPipe HD multi-currency crypto wallet is unlike any other — it’s not a cloud wallet or exchange. It’s a full-fledged Hierarchical Deterministic wallet with an independent infrastructure. The private keys are always solely under the user’s control and never leave the device.
Third Party Information
Once we determined that this app is non-custodial, we then proceeded to checks if they have made the source code publicly available.
We were able to find a bitcointalk.org thread about this topic which was posted on August 19, 2020.
Is your code open source? It says it is on your website (https://moneypipe.com/hd-wallet) under the FAQ section at the bottom, but I cannot find a link to a GitHub repository.
We are planning to make the app’s source code public in a few version updates - we still need to give it a good polish.
We tested the app and it has a bitcoin wallet with send and receive function. It also provided options to backup via a 12-word seed phrase.
Contrary to the Bitcoin thread above, we could no longer locate any mention of the project being open source. Searching for the appID ‘com.beecrypt.beecrypthd’ does not yield any relevant or related results on GitHub.
Without public source of the reviewed release available, this product cannot be verified!
As part of our Methodology, we ask:Is the source code publicly available? If not, we tag it No Source!
A wallet that claims to not give the provider the means to steal the users’ funds might actually be lying. In the spirit of “Don’t trust - verify!” you don’t want to take the provider at his word, but trust that people hunting for fame and bug bounties could actually find flaws and back-doors in the wallet so the provider doesn’t dare to put these in.
Back-doors and flaws are frequently found in closed source products but some remain hidden for years. And even in open source security software there might be catastrophic flaws undiscovered for years.
An evil wallet provider would certainly prefer not to publish the code, as hiding it makes audits orders of magnitude harder.
For your security, you thus want the code to be available for review.
If the wallet provider doesn’t share up to date code, our analysis stops there as the wallet could steal your funds at any time, and there is no protection except the provider’s word.
“Up to date” strictly means that any instance of the product being updated without the source code being updated counts as closed source. This puts the burden on the provider to always first release the source code before releasing the product’s update. This paragraph is a clarification to our rules following a little poll.
We are not concerned about the license as long as it allows us to perform our analysis. For a security audit, it is not necessary that the provider allows others to use their code for a competing wallet.
Share onTwitter Facebook LinkedIn
Or embed a widget in your website
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=android/com.beecrypt.beecrypthd&theme=auto&style=short" name="_ts" style="min-width:180px;border:0;border-radius:10px;max-width:280px;min-height:30px;"> </iframe>
<iframe src="https://walletscrutiny.com/widget/#appId=android/com.beecrypt.beecrypthd&theme=auto&style=long" style="max-width:100%;width:342px;border:0;border-radius:10px;min-height:290px;"> </iframe>